The things that can go wrong with treated water ...
Residents really rely on Councils and their workers in the delivery of clean water:
January 4, 2006
ESCONDIDO – A state water board has fined the city $1.8 million for numerous water-quality violations at its Hale Avenue sewage treatment plant.
In a letter dated Dec. 30, the state Regional Water Quality Control Board accused the city of a laundry list of violations at the plant. They range from a 354,000-gallon spill into Escondido Creek that affected the San Elijo Lagoon in Encinitas to 47 occurrences of overflows of wastewater from the plant between January and March of last year.
The board also penalized the city for failing to meet deadlines for completing compliance reports. Under one violation, the city allegedly did not submit status reports on its water-reclamation program for seven years.
The fines include a $1.2 million penalty the board imposed in 2004 for nearly 400 sewage-treatment violations over a period of weeks because of a failure of the treatment process used by the city plant.
Pat Thomas, the city's public works director, blamed heavy rains last winter for the sewage spills and overflows that resulted in additional fines last year.
"We've certainly made our best attempt to stay compliant with the board's complaints and permits," Thomas said yesterday.
Asked about the overdue reports, Thomas could not verify when they were submitted. He said he was unsure whether status reports were filed for the recycled-water program the city created a decade ago in response to a state mandate.
See - Escondido fined $1.8 million over water treatment.
11 Comments:
I am not sure of the connection between the article in this posting and the Water Futures Project being proposed by Toowoomba City Council. Why should we be concerned about the failing of another council, in another country?
8:26 PM, January 06, 2006
I am sure that the conclusion that can be drawn is that councills can and DO make mistakes and this is what we are afraid of here if this silly water sollution is alowed to go ahead just so e can be the guinnea pigs for the rest of Australia.
10:16 PM, January 06, 2006
The article highlights the risk that is taken when we put our faith in Councils. Mistakes can and do happen.
The Toowoomba City Council assures us that it won't happen but how sure can they be?
If you think that article isn't relevant to the debate, you probably won't like some of the ones in the near future either!
11:50 PM, January 06, 2006
So why should Toowoomba City Council be concerned with Singapore and Orange county water? The answer to you question is a question!
12:32 AM, January 07, 2006
Good point. If experience overseas is irrelevant, why does the Council so readily want to use these places as examples - even though California is still building the recycled water plant on which Toowoomba's will be modelled and Singapore has recently installed the largest desalination plant in Asia and is building a new dam. Not particularly good examples to use.
8:25 AM, January 07, 2006
The thing I cant understand is, most people in Toowoomba are quick to say no the treatment of water.
You say "this is not the solution, there is another way around this".
This is our only option for sustainable water supplies. But wait did you just say that there is another option?? As far as I know the people against this treatment have given up no other option.
Do your homework on "alternatives" before you make your decision. Put some faith in science instead of god for once.
10:20 PM, January 07, 2006
They're not saying no to the treatment of water and cleaning up the Murray Darling.
They're not saying no to the use of recycled water for industry.
They ARE saying no to the use of recycled water for drinking.
It is a last resort and all other options should be examined first.
These options include gas water (yet it is viable notwithstanding the quick dismissal by the Council) and swapping water supplies with other users.
Why pour potable water on cotton near Toowoomba and then make Toowoomba residents drink recycled sewage. If you think about that, it just doesn't make sense does it?
They ARE also objecting to the secretive way in which the Council has tried to introduce recycled water into Cooby Dam and the drinking water supply.
The behaviour of the Council and its consultants is shameful.
We wish the Council would do its homework on alternatives before making a decision.
Unfortunately, if you do any reading on the current experiences overseas, the science has holes in it - more research is required.
Look at the recent press articles on some of the problems now associated with Orange County and Virginia - places the Toowoomba City Council holds up as shining examples of recycled water use.
10:46 PM, January 07, 2006
The Council are all in disneyland - just like the brochures of Disneyland they handed out saying they used recycled water for drinking when the truth was that they don't drink the stuff.
When will this Council stop misleading the people who pay their salaries?!?
10:52 PM, January 07, 2006
The people who oppose the crazy option have put up credible other options and this council simplily dismisses them. I pipe line from Dalby in to Oakey with gas water would be a much better solution then being used as a Living Lab FOR the this Labour government
11:16 AM, January 08, 2006
The Mayor has said that Toowoomba won't be guinea pigs but it looks like the Nat. Water Comm. application says exactly that. What's going on?
9:09 PM, January 10, 2006
Toowoomba is to be the living laboratory for other cities in Australia and the world to come at gawk at.
2:56 PM, January 12, 2006
Post a Comment
<< Home